Pranks!!!

[Keeron_Man_boy]

Originally Posted by Shifty

Filled a guy in my classes entire locker with shaving cream... Took like 5 cans.

hahaha jay and i were going to do the same thing but with golf balls

we had a golf course bout 2min walk from out school so gettin the golf balls wasn;t the problem.. it was being bothered

[G00n-B@ndit]

ahahaha they're classic.. how the fk did u duct tape him to the ceiling :|

[ssurfy]

Originally Posted by Shifty

Ight Pranks. Man I am the god of them in my town. Lol I even sorta got a rep of a "freelance" pranker.

People would come to me and ask for ideas and help with them. Then when the prankee wanted payback they would come to me to... funny as.

Some of my best occured while drunk. One time me and a mate stole this guys car. But not like hotwired it or anything. It was so small me and a few friends lifted it and carried it around the block. Took him ages to find it.

Same guy, turned his car sideways in his driveway so there was only bout 10cm either side... dunno how he got it out.

Duct taped a mate to the roof (like the celling) when he passed out drinking once. Wish I was there when he woke up...

Camping at the river. Dug a hole bout 2 meters deep under a guys pop up tent. Couldnt telll until he got in.....

Filled a guy in my classes entire locker with shaving cream... Took like 5 cans.

Better stop before a blab on to much...

Hahahahaha wicked pranks dude, gonna keep some of 'em in mind

[Shifty]

Yeah man. Like I said I'm like the prank king in my town. Funny enought I really eva get pranked my self...

Duct taping some one to the celling? Well basicly got on a table and a few mates held him to the roof. Then we just tapped hs chest to the roof for starters. (bout 3 rolls worth) then his legs (nother 2 rolls or more) and then just went nuts with it. Stayed there prety well...

This is sorta wat it looked like octanecreative.com/ducttape/walltapings/index.html

Yeah another one that I did with a locker is lay it down on tis back and open them all and fill all of them with the little balls that come out of bean bag, closed them all and then tapped them all shut and stood it back up... Funny as hell

[G00n-B@ndit]

ahahah that would'v taken ages.. funny **** though.

our lockers r immovable

[ssurfy]

a muck up day prank I wanted to do was to get a toilet... dig a whole in the oval and cement the toilet into it

[gilez]

Originally Posted by Ben-Busltn/Dunsbrgh-2004

if you try buy the dvd you can be charged with trying to obtain child ****ography apparently. so i wouldnt suggest trying to look for it.

unless youre into that sort of ****. then you can burn in hell.

so you wouldn't **** a 17 year old? hardly sick child ****ography


_

Originally Posted by Jackle

But yes, you will be charged with child ****ography if you go watch it.

that's bull****, the person pictured has to look below 16 to get charged in australia -> that was just some scare mongering

[gnome]

actually you have to be 18

anyone who appearing in ****ographic material under the age of 18 is not legally able to do so and it is classed as child ****ography


and urinating on someone is classified as **** so there you have it

it is child ****ography, plus i have no ide what else they may have done in the video

[Sammy Wammy]

Originally Posted by gilez

so you wouldn't **** a 17 year old? hardly sick child ****ography

that doesnt make sense, and has nothing to do with it.

you have to be 18 to pose nude, otherwise its child nudity.
when you hit 16, you're free to have sex with a person of any age, unless they are more then 2 years younger then you.

[Ben]

Originally Posted by gilez

so you wouldn't **** a 17 year old? hardly sick child ****ography

thats not what i said. i said you can be charged with looking up child ****. and then i said, unless youre into that. into that (child ****) has nothing to do with sex with 17 year olds.

[gilez]

Originally Posted by Sammy Wammy

you have to be 18 to pose nude, otherwise its child nudity.
when you hit 16, you're free to have sex with a person of any age, unless they are more then 2 years younger then you.

you won't get charged for pictures of 16 and 17 year olds was what I was saying, technically yes it is the law that you have to be 18 to be in ****o's and yes the producers will get in trouble -> but there is no way you'll get charged with possesion of child ****ography if it's of a unknown 17yo

_

Originally Posted by Ben-Busltn/Dunsbrgh-2004

thats not what i said. i said you can be charged with looking up child ****. and then i said, unless youre into that. into that (child ****) has nothing to do with sex with 17 year olds.

you basically said seeing **** of a 17yo was gross and in the same category as seeing little kiddies which is total bs

[gnome]

Originally Posted by gilez

you won't get charged for pictures of 16 and 17 year olds was what I was saying, technically yes it is the law that you have to be 18 to be in ****o's and yes the producers will get in trouble -> but there is no way you'll get charged with possesion of child ****ography if it's of a unknown 17yo

i think you'd be suprised

[Ben]

Originally Posted by gilez

you basically said seeing **** of a 17yo was gross and in the same category as seeing little kiddies which is total bs

ahhhhh no i didnt. i said you can burn in hell if you like child ****. nothing more, nothing less. i shouldnt have to explain this **** anyway.

[Shifty]

Wait so what if i tape a chick that Im having sex with? And they say I can and all and they are under 18?

[Ben]

thats fine.
****ing hope so

[darkt3ch]

yeah i think thats all good n cool as long as ya dont release it... well lets hope thats the case

[gnome]

Originally Posted by Shifty

Wait so what if i tape a chick that Im having sex with? And they say I can and all and they are under 18?

that would be child ****


how old were you at the time

cos if you were under 18 the fact that you are there makes it child ****


but if you were'nt you can get in trouble


it's probably best you don't ever let that one out from under your bed...

[G00n-B@ndit]

gnomes exactly right..

it's not fken hard, the bottom line is, you have to be 18 to 'feature' in ****ography movies. any younger and its child ****, and any older you should prob try a career move i'd say.

[gilez]

Originally Posted by G00n-B@ndit

it's not fken hard, the bottom line is, you have to be 18 to 'feature' in ****ography movies.

wrong. there's several conditions for this rule, like if you were married for example

[G00n-B@ndit]

Originally Posted by gilez

wrong. there's several conditions for this rule, like if you were married for example

elaborate and state the source u got it from

[gnome]

Originally Posted by gilez

wrong. there's several conditions for this rule, like if you were married for example

umm even if ur married


u can't distribute the movie if it has someone under 18



do you just amke up these thinsg as you go along?

[gilez]

Originally Posted by gnome

umm even if ur married

u can't distribute the movie if it has someone under 18

do you just amke up these thinsg as you go along?

i never said anything about distributing anyway

Originally Posted by G00n-B@ndit

elaborate and state the source u got it from

CRIMES ACT 1958 - SECT 70

Possession of child ****ography

70. Possession of child ****ography





(1) A person who knowingly possesses child ****ography is guilty of an
indictable offence.

Penalty: Level 6 imprisonment (5 years maximum).

(2) It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against sub-section (1) to
prove-

(a) in the case of-

(i) a film; or

(ii) a photograph contained in a publication; or

(iii) a computer game-

that at the time of the alleged offence the film, publication or computer game
was classified other than RC or X or X 18+ or would, if classified, be
classified other than RC or X or X 18+; or

(b) that the film, photograph, publication or computer game possesses
artistic merit or is for a genuine medical, legal, scientific or
educational purpose; or

(c) that the defendant believed on reasonable grounds that the minor was
aged 18 years or older or that he or she was married to the minor; or

(d) that the defendant made the film or took the photograph or was given
the film or photograph by the minor and that, at the time of making,
taking or being given the film or photograph, the defendant was not
more than 2 years older than the minor was or appeared to be; or

(e) that the minor or one of the minors depicted in the film or photograph
is the defendant.

(3) Despite sub-section (2)(b), the defence of artistic merit cannot be relied
on in a case where the prosecution proves that the minor was actually under
the age of 18 years.

(4) Nothing in this section makes it an offence for-

(a) any member or officer of a law enforcement agency; or

(b) a person authorised in writing by the Chief Commissioner of Police
assisting such a member or officer; or

(c) a person belonging to a class of persons authorised in writing by the
Chief Commissioner of Police assisting such a member or officer-

to have child ****ography in his or her possession in the exercise or
performance of a power, function or duty conferred or imposed on the member or
officer by or under this or any other Act or at common law.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/v...95882/s70.html

[gnome]

you learn soemthign new everyday...

[G00n-B@ndit]

can't believe you went to the effort but well done hah

i dnt understand half of that ****, but sounds like you know ur ****.

i like it

[Ben]

ok, we went from pranks to ****. land we've had enough of that talk now. lets stay on topic.